Have you
ever heard of automated passenger drone ?
We’re
going to discuss about the first ever automated passenger drone Ehang 184. This seemed
like a pretty interesting topic so, I decided to discuss a little bit here.
Recently
it's becoming fairly obvious that drones and specifically the quadcopter industry
is blowing up. But so far consumer applications have been largely limited to
hobbyist flying, racing and filming.
This all
changed at CES 2016 when a Chinese manufacturer Ehang has unveiled the world's
first automated passenger drone.
The Ehang
184 is a fully electric aircraft that might sound a little strange at first. But
electric aircraft are indeed on the way. In fact, Airbus just created the first
electric planes across the English Channel in a late 2015 experiment.
The Ehang
184 is 5.5 meters long and it takes two hours to charge and can fly for 23 minutes
at about 500 meters off the ground.
It has a
maximum altitude of 3.5 kilometres and a top speed of 101 km/h and a fun fact
the flight destination interface is actually a Microsoft Surface tablet.
So where
did this drone come from ? The project was started in 2011 when Ehang’s young
CEO lost his good friend in a private plane accident and then later his
helicopter teacher.
From then
on Ehang founder who wanted to make sure that this new aircraft he was going to
make was going to be incredibly safe. So back to the Ehang 184, automation is a
great fit for this application because it cuts out pilot error.
Planes
much more complicated than this drone are flown by computer-controlled systems.
So this isn't
unusual at all.
The
company states that the navigation process is backed up by a 24/7 real-time
flight command centre and they think that that means passengers have no need
for a pilot's license.
The
downside though is that Ehung's case there
are no manual controls to take over in the
event of an emergency.
So,
there's a few remaining questions that
should be asked
Does the drain
have multiple redundant systems ? i.e. If
one mission critical element fails does the
craft keep aloft easily.
For
example, if one propeller is damaged can it be
flown automatically with ease. I'd expect this to be the case but there's no
confirmation.
If an object unexpectedly comes in front of
the drone how will it react. I guess we've
really seen some progress in that field by Intel and their drone.
So, I
guess we can say basic flying and evasive
action might not be the issue. But the real issue could be if there's an event that causes input data that confuses the computer. I think that's the most dangerous thing in this situation.
But according to Ehang, the drone has been tested hundreds of times over forests sometimes with passengers. But with these things, I guess you can never be too careful.
So, the
big question
Is this
the future of personal transport? For me personally
I think the short answer is No, not for this
vehicle anyway.
The
reason for me telling No is because the range is too short, the battery life is a major bottleneck and there's no way of resuming manual control in the event of an emergency and I don't think that this aircraft would pass FAA regulations anyway.
But that
is by no means the full story. I think a craft like this has potential for emergency respondents aid and can be very beneficial in situations where road access is limited.
But to further this without going into semantics, the formula that Ehang has here seems to be correct and if it's not these guys it will be some another company that builds on the synergy of a computer-guided and easy-to-use passenger drone to create something compelling.
It may be
many years before that happens. But to me Ehang
is the start of something.
So, the
bigger question
Is this
the template for the personal flying car
that we've all been promised all our lives?
I guess
only time will tell and wish these guys the best and I watch this space closely.
Thanks for reading this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment